AWS Textract vs Mistral OCR 4
Comprehensive 2026 technical breakdown comparing pricing per 1,000 pages, benchmark accuracy on printed text and tables, single-page latency, and developer ergonomics.
The Verdict: Mistral OCR 4
In this head-to-head evaluation, Mistral OCR 4 emerges as the stronger option with an overall rating of 9.7/10 versus AWS Textract's 8.9/10. If your top priority is deeply embedded in the aws ecosystem (native s3, sns, sqs, and lambda event triggers), go with AWS Textract. If you value highest benchmark score among closed-source commercial apis (85.20 on olmocr-bench & 93.07 on omnidocbench), Mistral OCR 4 is the superior choice.
Feature & Benchmark Comparison Matrix
Scroll horizontally on mobile →| Feature & Metric | AWS Textract Best for AWS Ecosystem & Tax Forms Amazon Web Services | Mistral OCR 4 Top VLM API Benchmark (85.20 OlmOCR-Bench) Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| 💰 Pricing & Licensing | ||
| Base OCR (per 1,000 pages) | $1.50 | $4.00 |
| Table Extraction (per 1k pages) | $15.00 | $4.00 |
| Forms & Key-Values (per 1k) | $50.00 | $5.00 |
| Recurring Free Tier | 1,000 pages raw text OCR; 100 pages Forms/Tables/Queries per month | $10 free trial API credit pool |
| Min Monthly Commitment | $0 / Pay-as-you-go | $0 / Pay-as-you-go |
| 🎯 OlmOCR-Bench & Accuracy Standards | ||
| OlmOCR-Bench Score (Unit Tests) | 76.5 /100 | 85.2 /100 |
| Table Structure (TEDS Score) | 93.8% | 95.8% |
| Handwriting Recognition | 88.4% (Good) | 94.3% (Excellent) |
| Single-Page Latency (p50) | 850 ms p95: 2100ms | 550 ms p95: 1400ms |
| ⚙️ Features & Document AI | ||
| Supported Languages | 6+ English, Spanish, German, Italian... | 170+ English, French, German, Spanish... |
| Deployment Modes | Cloud API (Synchronous & Asynchronous S3 Batch) | Cloud API (Standard & Batch), Self-Hosted Enterprise Container |
| Bounding Polygon Precision | Word-level | Block-level |
| Searchable PDF / Markdown | ✅ Searchable PDF | ✅ Searchable PDF |
| Compliance | SOC2 • HIPAA • GDPR | SOC2 • HIPAA • GDPR |
| 💻 Developer Ergonomics | ||
| Official SDKs | Python (Boto3), Node.js (AWS SDK), Go, Java, C#, REST API | Python, TypeScript/Node.js, REST API, LangChain, LlamaIndex |
| Setup Time | ~15 mins | ~5 mins |
| Max Payload / Pages | 10MB / 3000 pages | 50MB / 100 pages |
| Direct Links | ||
💰 Pricing & Monthly Cost Scenarios
For standard document OCR, AWS Textract is more affordable at $1.50 per 1,000 pages compared to Mistral OCR 4's $4.00 per 1,000 pages. When extracting structured tables and forms, AWS Textract charges $15.00/1k vs Mistral OCR 4's $4.00/1k.
| Volume Tier | AWS Textract | Mistral OCR 4 | Cheaper Option |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10,000 pages/mo (Starter) | $135 | $38 | Mistral OCR 4 (Save $97) |
| 50,000 pages/mo (Growth) | $735 | $198 | Mistral OCR 4 (Save $537) |
| 250,000 pages/mo (Enterprise) | $3,735 | $998 | Mistral OCR 4 (Save $2,737) |
| 1,000,000 pages/mo (Scale) | $14,985 | $3,998 | Mistral OCR 4 (Save $10,987) |
🎯 Accuracy & Latency Breakdown
On the OlmOCR-Bench deterministic benchmark, Mistral OCR 4 outperforms AWS Textract (85.2 vs 76.5), exhibiting fewer hallucinations on multi-column reading order and mathematical typography. Both solutions offer comparable table parsing quality (93.8% vs 95.8% TEDS score).
Speed & Latency Profile
Mistral OCR 4 is the faster engine with an average single-page response time of 550ms (vs AWS Textract's 850ms). This makes Mistral OCR 4 particularly advantageous for user-facing applications requiring instantaneous feedback.
Table & Structure Recognition
AWS Textract (93.8% TEDS) vs Mistral OCR 4 (95.8% TEDS). AWS Textract provides native table bounding boxes and structural HTML/Markdown mappings. Mistral OCR 4 includes dedicated table parsing capabilities.
Composite Performance Breakdown
AWS Textract Score Breakdown
Standardized 1-10 benchmark scaleMistral OCR 4 Score Breakdown
Standardized 1-10 benchmark scaleWhen to Choose AWS Textract
Best suited for developers and companies that prioritize:
- ✓ Enterprises deeply entrenched in AWS infrastructure
- ✓ Mortgage and loan origination document parsing
- ✓ US tax form (W-2, 1099, 1040) processing
- ✓ Automated S3 document ingestion pipelines
- ✓ You want lower base OCR pricing ($1.5/1k vs $4/1k)
When to Choose Mistral OCR 4
Best suited for developers and companies that prioritize:
- ✓ Enterprise search, RAG ingestion, and agentic reasoning pipelines
- ✓ Scientific and academic papers with dense multi-column layouts and LaTeX math
- ✓ Complex tables requiring clean HTML DOM representation
- ✓ Global multilingual document processing across 170 languages
- ✓ You need faster response times (~550ms vs ~550ms)
💻 Quickstart Code Snippets
See how each library processes a document in Python:
import boto3
textract = boto3.client('textract', region_name='us-east-1')
with open('invoice.pdf', 'rb') as doc:
response = textract.analyze_expense(
Document={'Bytes': doc.read()}
)
for doc in response['ExpenseDocuments']:
for field in doc['SummaryFields']:
print(f"{field['Type']['Text']}: {field['ValueDetection']['Text']}")from mistralai import Mistral
client = Mistral(api_key="your_api_key")
response = client.ocr.process(
model="mistral-ocr-latest",
document={"type": "document_url", "document_url": "https://example.com/paper.pdf"},
table_format="html",
include_image_base64=True
)
print(response.pages[0].markdown)❓ AWS Textract vs Mistral OCR 4 FAQs
Which is cheaper: AWS Textract or Mistral OCR 4? ▼
AWS Textract costs $1.50 per 1,000 base pages vs Mistral OCR 4 at $4.00 per 1,000 base pages. For table parsing, AWS Textract is $15.00/1k vs Mistral OCR 4 at $4.00/1k.
Which OCR API has higher accuracy: AWS Textract or Mistral OCR 4? ▼
In standardized benchmark testing on clean printed text, AWS Textract achieved 98.1% accuracy compared to Mistral OCR 4's 99%. On complex table structure extraction, AWS Textract recorded a 93.8% TEDS score vs Mistral OCR 4's 95.8% TEDS score.
Which API is faster: AWS Textract or Mistral OCR 4? ▼
AWS Textract has an average single-page response time of 850ms (p50 latency) vs Mistral OCR 4's 550ms. Under high concurrency, AWS Textract reaches 2100ms p95 latency vs Mistral OCR 4's 1400ms.
When should I choose AWS Textract over Mistral OCR 4? ▼
Choose AWS Textract if you prioritize: Enterprises deeply entrenched in AWS infrastructure, Mortgage and loan origination document parsing, US tax form (W-2, 1099, 1040) processing. Choose Mistral OCR 4 if you prioritize: Enterprise search, RAG ingestion, and agentic reasoning pipelines, Scientific and academic papers with dense multi-column layouts and LaTeX math, Complex tables requiring clean HTML DOM representation.